Committee Minutes


PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
City of Grand Forks, North Dakota
February 6, 2008

1. MEMBERS PRESENT

The meeting was called to order by Paula Lee at 7:00 p.m. with the following members present: Steve Adams, Doug Christensen, John Drees, Robert Drees, Al Grasser, Dr. Lyle Hall, Bill Hutchison, Gary Malm, Frank Matejcek and Marijo Whitcomb. Absent: Tom Hagness, Curt Kreun, and Mayor (Dr.) Michael Brown. A quorum was present.

Staff present included Brad Gengler, City Planner; Charles Durrenberger, Senior Planner; Ryan Brooks, Senior Planner (Planning and Zoning Department); and Peggy McNelis, GF/EGF MPO Executive Assistant and Bev Collings, Building and Zoning Administrator (Inspections Office). Absent: Carolyn Schalk, Administrative Specialist, Senior.

2. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR JANUARY 2, 2008.

Lee asked if there were any corrections or changes to the minutes of January 2, 2008.
No changes or corrections were noted and Lee said the minutes would stand as presented.

PUBLIC HEARINGS, FINAL APPROVALS, PETITIONS AND MINOR CHANGES:

3-1. MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM MINNKOTA POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., FOR APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO ANNEX LOT 2, BLOCK 1, PRAIRIE POWER ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED AT SOUTH 58TH STREET, BETWEEN 11TH AVENUE SOUTH AND 17TH AVENUE SOUTH.

Gengler reported that this item involves a resolution to annex the Minnkota property located west of the Industrial Park. He stated that the commission has already acted on the plat and rezoning.

Gengler referred to a plat drawing of the property, and pointed out that while he highlighted Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the subdivision, currently only Lot 2 is what is being requested for annexation. He stated that staff did look at various alternatives and in concurrence with Minnkota determined that Lot 2 would be annexed today, but, as stated in the staff report, agreed annexation of the remaining subdivision property would not be opposed in the future. He explained that he did work with Howard Swanson, City Attorney, on this issue and under state law it is legal to enter into this type of agreement if the property in question is within a quarter-mile or less from City limits. He pointed out that a representative from Minnkota is here this evening in the event anyone may have any questions or concerns regarding this issue.

MOTION BY CHRISTENSEN AND SECONDED BY WHITCOMB TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO ANNEX LOT 2, BLOCK 1, PRAIRIE POWER ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA; AND TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL GIVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION ON FEBRUARY 19, 2008, AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE AS REQUIRED BY LAW.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4. COMMUNICATIONS AND PRELIMINARY APPROVALS:

4-1. MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM PRIBULA ENGINEERING, ON BEHALF OF VIOLET THEIS AND PIERCE INC., FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF KORYNTA-LEMM 4TH RESUBDIVISION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED AT GATEWAY DRIVE AND NORTH 48TH STREET.

Durrenberger referred to a plat drawing and reported that this item involves the resubdivision of two existing subdivisions located along Gateway Drive. He explained that the request is to eliminate the small lots along Gateway Drive and create five larger lots to the rear of the subdivision to allow development of a tire store on Lot 5. He added that there are two related requests, one to vacate the utility easement and the other to annex the property. He stated that staff does recommend approval subject to the technical conditions listed in the staff report and the inclusion of a Street and Highway Ordinance.

Grasser commented that, for the record, he would like to point out that there is a sanitary sewer within the sanitary sewer easement that is being requested be vacated. He said that staff does not have a problem with vacating the easement, but does want to make sure everyone is aware that there is pipe located within that easement should a building be located there.

Malm asked for clarification as to what is actually being done, whether or not the request is to put one lot in the front. Durrenberger responded that the two subdivisions are going to be replatted into one subdivision with five lots, with a tire store being located on Lot 5, and the remaining four lots being vacant. Malm asked if the owners have been informed as to what kind of store they can locate on this property, and whether or not the rules this body discussed for this area of town have been put into place yet. Gengler responded that the ordinance in question was submitted to the City Attorney’s office for review and was only recently given back to staff. He stated that it now needs to be submitted to the City Council for final approval.

MOTION BY MALM AND SECONDED BY WHITCOMB TO GRANT PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF KORYNTA-LEMM 4TH RESUBDIVISION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL CHANGES SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY AND INCLUSION OF A STREET AND HIGHWAY ORDINANCE.
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Check distance on the south line of Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, of Korynta Court Subdivision.
3. Extend utility easements around now Lot 5.
4. Include spot ground elevations.
5. Widen right-of-way along North 48th Street from 40-feet to 50-feet.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-2. MATTER OF THE PETITION FROM VIOLET THEIS FOR APPROVAL TO VACATE A 20-FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOT B, BLOCK A, KORYNTA-LEMM SUBDIVISION.

Durrenberger reported that this item involves the vacation of a 20-foot utility easement. He said that they will have to remove the existing sanitary sewer line located within that easement in order to construct their store on Lot 5. He added that they will maintain a sewer line along the western edge of the property, and that there are currently water lines along the eastern edge of the property that serve Strata as well. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the vacation.

MOTION BY HUTCHISON AND SECONDED BY MALM TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TO VACATE A 20-FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOT B, BLOCK A, KORYNTA-LEMM SUBDIVISION.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-3. MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM VIOLET THEIS FOR APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE TO ANNEX LOT 5, BLOCK 1, KORYNTA-LEMM 4TH RESUBDIVISION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED AT GATEWAY DRIVE AND NORTH 48TH STREET.

Durrenberger reported that the request is to annex the rear portion of Lot 5. He referred to a plat drawing of the property and pointed out that a portion of the property is currently within City limits and does not need to be annexed. He stated that staff recommends approval of the annexation request.

Lee pointed out that the annexation point system was included for review. Malm agreed, and thanked staff for the information.

MOTION BY CHRISTENSEN AND SECONDED BY ADAMS TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE TO ANNEX ALL OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, KORYNTA-LEMM 4TH RESUBDIVISION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA AND TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL GIVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE ON FEBRUARY 19, 2008 AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE AS REQUIRED BY LAW.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-4. MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM ADVANCED ENGINEERING, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 43 TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED EAST OF NORTH 3RD STREET BETWEEN DEMERS AVENUE AND GATEWAY DRIVE. THE REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES A VARIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO SECTION 18-0907(1)(L) WITH REGARDS TO ELEVATION CONTOURS AND SECTION 18-0907(1)(C) WITH REGARDS TO AN EASILY INTERPRETED SCALE.

Durrenberger reported that this plat includes the property that extends from DeMers Avenue, east of the pump station and including the pump station, the commercial properties that are to the west of the flood wall and the dike that are not in the previous subdivision, several utility easements, a bikepath, and a portion of DeMers Boulevard that will subsequently be requested be vacated. He stated that this is one of our last flood protection projects and staff is recommending approval subject to the technical changes listed and the inclusion of a Street and Highway Ordinance.

MOTION BY GRASSER AND SECONDED BY ADAMS FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 43 TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA, LOCATED EAST OF NORTH 3RD STREET BETWEEN DEMERS AVENUE AND GATEWAY DRIVE, AND A VARIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO SECTION 18-0907(1)(L) AND SECTION 18-0907(1)(C) SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TECHNCIAL CHANGES SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY AND THE INCLUSION OF A STREET AND HIGHWAY ORDINANCE.
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Show length on all line segments.
3. Add document numbers for all vacation areas.
4. Correctly show the 100-year flood line as the levee or concrete wall centerline.
5. Plat requires a street and highway ordinance as new rights-of-way are included.
6. Correctly identify the president and secretary of the planning and zoning commission.
7. Include square footage for Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4.
8. Plat acceptance recognizes a variance to the land development code 18-0907(1)(L) with regards to elevation contours.
9. Correct dates shown within the surveyor’s certificate and the city council approval.
10. Plat acceptance recognizes a variance to the land development code 18-0907(1)© with regards to an easily interpreted scale.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-5. MATTER OF THE PETITION FROM ADVANCED ENGINEERING, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, FOR APPROVAL TO VACATE UTILITY EASEMENTS, ALLEYWAYS, STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BIKEPATH AND BIKEWAY EASEMENTS AND FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENTS, LOCATED IN SAINT ANNE’S RESUBDIVISION, BALTIC FIRST RESUBDIVISION, AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 13 AND AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 17 AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP.

Durrenberger reported that this vacation will take care of unneeded utility easements, and bikepath and bikeway easements. He commented that only a portion of Lewis Boulevard is being vacated as the City prefers to keep the remainder dedicated so that the granitoid does not go back to a private property owner in order to have more control over what happens to that granitoid in the future. He added that that part of Riverboat Road not being used, the alley, and the permanent flood easement are also included in the vacation as well. He stated that there are two plats included in the packet that show all the different areas included in the vacation. He said that staff is recommending approval.

MOTION BY HALL AND SECONDED BY GRASSER TO APPROVE THE VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS, ALLEWAYS, STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY, A BIKE PATH AND BIKEWAY EASEMENTS AND FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENTS, LOCATED IN SAINT ANNE’S RESUBDIVISION, BALTIC FIRST RESUBDIVISION, AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 17 AND AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 13 AND RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL GIVE FINAL APPROVAL TO THE PETITION AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-6. MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM ADVANCED ENGINEERING, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 44 TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED EAST OF OLSON DRIVE AND ELMWOOD DRIVE FROM 25TH AVENUE SOUTH TO 32ND AVENUE SOUTH. THE REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES A VARIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18-0907(1)(L) WITH REGARDS TO ELEVATION CONTOURS.

Brooks reported that this plat is located on the riverside of Olson Drive and Elmwood Drive, roughly north of 32nd Avenue South. He stated that this is a clean-up plat as a result of the flood control project. He explained that it involves two lots, one small lot on the dry side of the floodwall and the other on the wet side of the floodwall. He said that he would also like to point out that the request does include a variance related to the contour elevations and that we need to include a variance for the easily interpreted scale allowing it to remain at 1-150.

MOTION BY WHITCOMB AND SECONDED BY HUTCHISON FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF AUDITOR’S RESUBDIVISION NO. 44 TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA, LOCATED EAST OF OLSON DRIVE AND ELMWOOD DRIVE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY, AND TO INCLUDE A VARIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18-0907(1)(L) AND TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL GIVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT ON FEBRUARY 19, 2008, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY AND ALSO TO INCLUDE A VARIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18-0907(1)(L) AND THAT THEY SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 17, 2008.
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Show a length on all line and curve segments.
3. Include document numbers for all vacated areas.
4. Correctly show the 100-year flood line as the dike levee or concrete wall centerline.
5. Plat acceptance recognizes a variance to the land development code 18-0907(1)(L) with regards to elevation contours.
6. Show a solid line around proposed Lot 1.
7. Add all curve data to the curve table.
8. Floodplain note should be revised to reflect the new FIRM map.
9. Add square footage for both lots.
10. Correctly identify the president and secretary of the planning and zoning commission.
11. Use shorter version of city council approval as no new rights-of-way are included in this plat.
12. Change plat title to Auditor’s Resubdivision No. 44.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-7. MATTER OF THE PETITION FROM ADVANCED ENGINEERING, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, FOR APPROVAL TO VACATE A 20-FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE REAR LINE OF LOT E, BLOCK 4 OF A REPLAT OF LOTS 2 AND 3 IN BLOCK 4, FLAAT’S ADDITION, CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND.

Brooks referred to a plat drawing and pointed out where the easement is located. He explained that there had been a home located near it at one time and was served by utilities located in that easement. He stated, however, that that is no longer the case and the easement is no longer required, therefore staff is recommending approval of the vacation.

MOTION BY CHRISTENSEN AND SECONDED BY MATEJECK FOR APPROVAL TO VACATE A 20-FOOT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE REAR LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK 4 OF A REPLAT OF LOTS 2 AND 3 IN BLOCK 4, FLAAT’S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA AND RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL GIVE FINAL APPROVAL TO THE PETITION AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-8. MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM ADVANCED ENGINEERING, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF SUN-BEAM SIXTH RESUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT NORTHRIDGE HILLS COURT TO 47TH AVENUE SOUTH ALONG THE RED RIVER. THE REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES A VARIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18-0907(1)(L) WITH REGARDS TO ELEVATION CONTOURS.

Gengler reported that the purpose of this item is to consolidate lots located on the wet side of the flood wall as part of the greenway. He stated that staff recommends approval subject to the technical conditions listed on the review copy.

MOTION BY CHRISTENSEN AND SECONDED BY MALM FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF SUN-BEAM SIXTH RESUBDIVISION TO INCLUDE A VARIANCE TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18-0907(1)(L) SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY AND TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL GIVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT ON FEBRUARY 19, 2008 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY AND THAT THEY SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 17, 2008.
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Change plat title to Sun-Beam Sixth Resubdivision.
3. Show a length on all line and curve segments.
4. Include document numbers for all vacated areas.
5. Correctly show the 100-year flood line as the dike or wall centerline.
6. Plat acceptance recognizes a variance to the land development code 18-0907(1)(L) with regards to elevations contours.
7. Change Lot No. 102 to Lot 1.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

4-9. MATTER OF THE PETITION FROM ADVANCED ENGINEERING, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, FOR APPROVAL TO VACATE VARIOUS BIKEWAY, PEDESTRIAN, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALK AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN BLOCKS H, 16, F, AND W OF SUN-BEAM ADDITION AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAPS.

Gengler reported that this vacation coincides with the Sun-Beam plat that this body just gave preliminary approval to. He stated that the situation with the easements are the same therefore staff recommends approval.

MOTION BY MALM AND SECONDED BY CHRISTENSEN TO APPROVE THE VACATION OF VARIOUS BIKEWAY, PEDESTRIAN, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALK AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN BLOCKS H, 16, 4, AND W OF SUN-BEAM ADDITION AND RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL GIVE FINAL APPROVAL TO THE PETITION ON FEBRUARY 19, 2008, AND THAT THEY SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

5. REPORTS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

5-1. MATTER OF PRESENTATION BY ADAM JONASSON, CITY GIS COORDINATOR, OF THE CITY’S GIS (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM).

Gengler reported that Adam Jonasson, GIS Coordinator, is present today to give about a fifteen-minute overview of the City’s GIS. He explained that over the years that system as continued to grow, and Mr. Jonasson has done a marvelous job spearheading the process. He added that the county has as similar system on their website, however the City’s is a little different, and is a little more functional for both staff and the public.

Jonasson then gave a brief presentation of the City of Grand Forks’ GIS. He explained that there is both an internal and an external system, with the external system being available to the public on the City’s Website.

Presentation ensued.

QUESTIONS:

Grasser asked if the new LOMAR had been downloaded yet. Jonasson responded that he did. He added that he removed the old LOMAR information from the external system but both are still available on the internal system.

Hall asked if the GPS systems like Tom Tom and Garmin get their information from the City or do they have to get their own information. Jonasson responded that they go get it from the City. He explained that there are clearing houses that contact all of the cities, including one in Fargo, that will get centerline data and other information and get it to the various GPS entities. Lee asked if any royalties were paid for this information. Jonasson responded that it depends on whether or not the clearing house sells its information. He explained that if they do then we may charge them as well.

Information only.

5-2. MATTER OF SELECTION OF ONE MEMBER TO ATTEND APA CONFERENCE IN APRIL 27- MAY 1, 2008.

Gengler reported that the APA conference, which occurs each year in a different location, will be held in Las Vegas on April 27 through May 1 this year. He stated that after going through the history of who has gone to one of these conferences, and who hasn’t Mr. Adams, who is a new member of the commission, came up as a possible attendee. He said that he did contact him to see if he would be interested in going this year and was told that he would check on his availability and let him know as soon as possible. He added that in the event that Mr. Adams cannot attend, other members will be canvassed at that time.

5-3. MATTER OF DISCUSSION REGARDING COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.

Gengler distributed copies of a list of the various committees and subcommittees that Planning Commission members serve on and asked that everyone please take a look at it. He pointed out that there are several members that serve on one or more, and some that don’t serve on any, and he would like everyone to at least consider maybe serving on one of these committees or subcommittees in the future. He stated that if anyone has any questions as to what any of the committees do, or how often they meet, please feel free to contact him. He added that a few of the committees will be becoming more active including the Land Development Code Review Committee, the Sign Sub-Committee, etc..

5-4. MATTER OF DISCUSSION REGARDING STARTING THE MEETINGS AT 5:30 P.M.

Gengler stated that this item was placed on the agenda purely for consideration. He commented that the City Council has been meeting at 5:30 p.m. for quite some time and it appears to be working quite nicely for officials, staff, and the public, so staff thought it might be something for this body to consider as well. He asked that everyone please think about the possibility of holding the Planning Commission meetings at 5:30 p.m. instead of 7:00 p.m., and with concurrence from the chair, add it to next month’s agenda for discussion.

Christensen asked for a show of hands for changing the meeting time to 5:30 p.m.. Five members did raise their hands, but everyone felt that more time was needed for consideration of schedules, etc., and that it would be best to place the issue on next month’s agenda. Lee added that the possibility of other times, such as 6:00 or 6:30 p.m. also be considered as well.

6. OTHER BUSINESS:

6-1 MATTER OF DISCUSSION ON STATUS OF LAND USE DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE

Christensen asked what the status was on the Land Use Development Code Ordinance. Gengler responded that it should be the Land Development Code Committee’s choice as to whether or not they want to see the ordinance again. He explained that, as you will recall, the ordinance was tabled by the City Council when it was submitted to them for preliminary approval, so protocal would be to take it back to City Council but if the Land Development Code Review Committee wants to see it once more before that happens it should be done soon. Christensen stated that he would like to see it approved and in place as soon as possible, and if we have to tweak it after that then we can amend it at that time. Gengler asked if it wouldn’t be better to have the committee look at it again before it is resubmitted to the City Council. Christensen asked if there were a lot of changes needing to be made to the ordinance. Gengler responded that there were, adding that he feels it would be beneficial for the committee to look at it again first. Christensen asked if a meeting could be scheduled, then, for next week. Gengler responded that he would get a meeting scheduled for next Thursday.

6-2 MATTER OF PLACING PROPOSED 5:30 P.M. MEETING TIME ON AGENDA

Christensen stated that he would like the proposed 5:30 p.m. meeting time placed on the next agenda for discussion. He added that he would like to say that, having been a little reluctant to the change for the City Council, he must say that it has been working surprisingly well for him and his constituents, as well as for staff, and while he realizes that it may be a little difficult for some members of the commission, he would ask that we at least consider trying it to see if it would work.

6-3 MATTER OF DISCUSSION ON LED SIGNS

Christensen stated that in regard to the flashing LED sign issue, if we are planning on studying that issue we might want to consider placing a moratorium on the placement of such signs until that study can be completed. Gengler agreed. Christensen asked that the issue of a moratorium be placed on the next City Council agenda for action.

6-4 MATTER OF CONGRATULATING GARY MALM ON APPOINTMENT

Gengler said that congratulations are in order for Gary Malm who was just reappointed to the Planning Commission for another five-years.

Gengler added that in addition to Mr. Malm’s reappointment, it is hoped that a representative to fill Dr. Kweit’s position should also be completed for the next Planning Commission meeting.

7. ADJOURNMENT.

MOTION BY MATEJCEK AND SECOND BY J. DREES TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:50 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

____________________________
Lyle A. Hall, Secretary


____________________________
Paula H. Lee, President