Print VersionStay Informed
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
City of Grand Forks, North Dakota
September 5, 2007


1. MEMBERS PRESENT

The meeting was called to order by Paula Lee, President, at 7:00 p.m. with the following members present: Steve Adams, Doug Christensen, John Drees, Robert Drees, Al Grasser, Tom Hagness, Dr. Lyle Hall, Bill Hutchison, Curt Kreun, Gary Malm, Frank Matejcek and Marijo Whitcomb. Absent: Mayor (Dr.) Michael Brown. A quorum was present.

Staff present included Brad Gengler, City Planner; Charles Durrenberger, Senior Planner; Ryan Brooks, Senior Planner; and Carolyn Schalk, Administrative Specialist, Senior, Planning and Zoning Department; and Bev Collings, Building and Zoning Administrator (Building Inspections Office). Absent: None.

2. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR AUGUST 1, 2007.

Lee asked if there were any revisions or corrections to the minutes of August 1, 2007. There were no revisions or corrections noted and Lee stated the minutes would stand approved as presented.

3. PUBLIC HEARINGS, FINAL APPROVALS, PETITIONS AND MINOR CHANGES:

3-1. (PUBLIC HEARING) MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM MEREDITH RICHARDS, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT OF LOTS 2 THROUGH 8 AND THE NORTH 10 FEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK 1, WALCHESTER PLACE ADDITION, CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED IN THE 1500 BLOCK OF WALNUT STREET.

Brooks reviewed the request for the city-owned property purchased for flood control. The original homes were demolished and the property is being replatted from seven to six lots, which allows the lots to be slightly widened. The plat was tabled at the August meeting (final approval) because of drainage concerns by the city engineer. The subject area is the low point and the drainage concerns raised by the city engineer made it necessary to review it more closely. One of the recommendations is to place access control on the ease side of the alley in order to prevent prospective homeowners from building a garage that accesses from the alley. City engineers want the water to continue to drain away from the alley. Building garages in the alley would block water drainage and create problems for other homeowners. Brooks explained that Urban Development is going through a bid process by RFP (Request for Proposals). The plans or proposals are reviewed and homeowners will be made aware of the access control on the alley. The lots will be front-loaded with access on Walnut Street as it was pre-flood. There will be modest homes built on the lots that will fit in well with the neighborhood. He noted that the homes that front onto Cottonwood Street to the west do not have garages on the backside, but there are several sheds.

Grasser, city engineer, made the comment that at one time it was thought they would have to run the drainage along the back lot lines but after further review, it was decided to run the drainage along the lot lines to the street. He was concerned that if a homeowner did try to access off the high elevation of the alley and problems occurred, the city might be liable for it. They felt it was a prudent solution to the issue.

Lee opened the public hearing. There was no one to talk on the issue and the public hearing was closed.

MOTION BY MALM AND SECOND BY HAGNESS TO APPROVE THE REPLAT REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL CHANGES SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY:
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Add access control along rear (alley) line of Lots A-F.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

3-2. (PUBLIC HEARING) MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM TIM BROWN, ON BEHALF OF AGRI PARK II, LLC., FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PLAT OF BROWN CORPORATION SECOND ADDITION, LOCATED ON MERRIFIELD ROAD AND SOUTH 42ND STREET.

Gengler reviewed the plat request, noting the supplemental technical change form passed out to each member. Technical change number six was added stating the proper language to be used on the plat under the “notes section.” Staff recommendation was for final approval of the plat request.

Robert Drees stated that Merrifield Road is the generally accepted name for the road but the technical name according to the county is 12th Avenue Northeast. Gengler said the city had formally adopted the reports and studies with the designation of Merrifield Road. Staff will check on it and see if it needs to be changed.

It was noted the post office uses the 12th Avenue NE as the proper address. Kreun suggested putting 12th Avenue Northeast in parenthesis after Merrifield Road and that should suffice.

Lee opened the public hearing. There was no one to speak on the issue and the public hearing was closed.

MOTION BY WHITCOMB AND SECOND BY JOHN DREES TO APPROVE THE PLAT REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL CHANGES SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY (ADDITION OF NO. 6) AND ALSO APPROVAL OF THE STREET AND HIGHWAY ORDINANCE:
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Plat acceptance recognizes that outlot A is an unbuildable lot with no access.
3. In lieu of roadway maintenance plan, add note number 3 that Rylan Road shall be privately owned and maintained until such time as these lands are annexed by the city of Grand Forks.
4. Include square footage and acreage for all lots.
5. Correctly identify lot 1, block 2 and lot 1, block 1.
6. Change the note located within Outlot A to read: Future Merrifield /I-29 Interchange Area as per the Merrifield Road and I-29 Interchange Justification Report dated October 3, 2002.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.


3-3. (PUBLIC HEARING) MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM CPS, LTD., ON BEHALF OF VISIM, LLP, FOR FINAL APPROVAL (FAST TRACK) OF THE REPLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, AMUNDSON’S SECOND RESUBDIVISION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, TO ALSO INCLUDE A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 18-0907(4)(L)(1)(d) FOR THE PURPOSE OF VARYING THE SUBDIVISION CODE REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW A SECOND ACCESS, LOCATED AT 3101 SOUTH 42ND STREET.

Durrenberger reviewed the request for a lot split on the property located between the Amundson’s Funeral Home and the All Reasons Storage unit business. The replat will accommodate a 100-unit hotel on the southern portion of the property. The northern portion of the property will allow another development in the future, possibly a multi-family development. When the area was originally platted, there was one access point on the eastern edge of lot one. The owner has requested a second access near the western lot line, located across from the Nodak headquarters access. The second access requires a variance. There is approximately 229 feet between the two proposed hotel accesses and another 326 feet from the west access to the Amundsons Funeral Home. Staff reviewed several factors for the variance request. The Nodak property has two accesses and it is not uncommon to have two accesses for a property. There is also the possibility, based on the transportation plan update, of re-routing the access on South 42nd Street to 32nd Avenue South, closing off the existing ramp on I-29, and moving the access ramp westward in order not to interfere with the proposed signalized intersection. If the plan is implemented, much of the traffic would be eliminated on South 42nd Street in front of the hotel reducing conflicts with traffic entering or leaving the hotel. The variance would allow a closer separation. Normally 660 feet is required for a separation. With these two considerations, planning staff recommends approval of the replat with the variance and subject to the technical changes.

Malm stated the hotel has already started construction. Durrenberger said they received a footings and foundation permit.

Hagness spoke on the variance request and stated it made good sense for a second access for good traffic flow.

Durrenberger commented he had visited with the traffic engineer and there might be some conflict with people leaving the hotel eastbound on South 42nd Street, but it could be striped to aid in eliminating any problems.

Grasser said some modifications would have to be made to South 38th Street in the future. South 31st Street (in front of the hotel) will become a local street. He also noted there was no alterations for the hotel location on the site plan, regardless of the inclusion of one or two driveways. The footings and foundation permit was not tied to the decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission. With the short construction season, the hotel wanted to get the project started before winter sets in.

Hutchison asked how far apart the accesses were for the Nodak facility and Durrenberger said approximately 400 feet.

Malm asked when the South 42nd Street would be re-routed.

Christensen said it was in the Grand Forks-East Grand Forks Metropolitan Planning Organization project plan and that plan was being modified to do that. Since money is not forthcoming from Congress, it would probably be five or ten years before the project is done. They need money to do the projects.

Malm also discussed the need for traffic control and a left turn signal on South 38th Street between Menard’s and the gas station. That situation has been an on-going problem.

Christensen said that was all based on funding and the city needs the federal match. Grasser said there were various intersections in town, including the one on South 38th Street, that is being reviewed for a left turn signal but not only is funding an issue but the legal aspects have to be in place. The MPO will be doing traffic counts soon and that data is necessary for justification before they can proceed.

Lee opened the public hearing. There was no one to speak on the issue and the public hearing was closed.

MOTION BY HUTCHISON AND SECOND BY JOHN DREES TO APPROVE THE REPLAT REQUEST, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL CHANGES SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY:
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Use correct distance on west line of “Lot B.”
3. Plat acceptance recognizes a variance to the Land Development Code relating to right-of-way access (18-0907(2)(L)) for the access control along South 42nd Street.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

3-4. (PUBLIC HEARING) MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM WIDSETH, SMITH AND NOLTING AND ASSOCIATES, ON BEHALF OF VALDAK CORPORATION, FOR FINAL APPROVAL (FAST TRACK) OF THE REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MEADOW RIDGE FIRST ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED AT SOUTH WASHINGTON STREET AND 47TH AVENUE SOUTH.

Durrenberger reviewed the replat request. There is currently an approved site plan for the new Valley Dairy store located on the corner of South Washington Street and 47th Avenue South. The replat request is to separate two retail buildings, creating three lots. The replat proposal provides access easements for all facilities with no changes on the parking and landscaping. Staff recommends approval of the request.

Lee opened the public hearing. There was no one to speak on the issue and the public hearing was closed.

MOTION BY DR. HALL AND SECOND BY MALM TO APPROVE THE REPLAT REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL CHANGES SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY:
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Check the size of “Lot C” as it appears to be different than what is shown on the detailed development plan. Adjust all distances and volumes accordingly.
3. Use shorter version of the city council approval. A street and highway ordinance is not required because all street rights-of-way were previously platted.
4. Submit copies of any crossover/maintenance agreements that affect newly created Lots B and C.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

3-5. (PUBLIC HEARING) MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM CHENEY-DAKOTA, LLC, FOR FINAL APPROVAL (FAST TRACK) OF THE REPLAT OF LOTS J AND K, BLOCK 1, OF THE REPLAT OF LOT C, BLOCK 1 OF THE REPLAT OF LOTS 1-6, BLOCK 1, COLUMBIA PARK 27TH ADDITION TO THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, ND, LOCATED AT 3901 32ND AVENUE SOUTH.

Brooks reviewed the request, stating the property is located between the Village Inn and Arby’s. The lot is currently divided north and south and the request is to divide the property east and west so each side has 32nd Avenue South frontage. Staff is currently reviewing a site plan for the IHOP restaurant to be located on the eastern portion of the property.

Lee opened the public hearing. There was no one to speak on the issue and the public hearing was closed.

MOTION BY CHRISTENSEN AND SECOND BY ADAMS TO APPROVE THE REPLAT REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL CHANGES SHOWN ON OR ATTACHED TO THE REVIEW COPY:
1. Submit title opinion.
2. Change Lots 1 and 2 to Lots L and M.
3. Remove “Cheney Dakota First Addition” from plat title, as replatted lots should remain as part of Columbia Park 27th Addition.
4. Add “a replat of Lots J and K” to the plat title.
5. Label 50-foot access and utility easement areas as being privately owned and maintained.
6. Remove the words “per plat” from all easements to be vacated with this document.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

Malm stated there would be more traffic in that area.

Christensen complimented staff on bringing the fast track items to the commission as quickly as possible.

3-6. (PUBLIC HEARING) MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM EAPC ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS, ON BEHALF OF THE GRAND FORKS GROWTH FUND (AMAZON.COM), FOR APPROVAL OF AN APPEAL TO THE INDUSTRIAL 2ND PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LOT A, BLOCK 3, MAIER’S 4TH RESUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT 1550 SOUTH 48TH STREET. THE APPEAL IS TO INCREASE THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA MAXIMUM FROM 85% TO 87% TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.

Gengler reviewed the appeal request for the proposed parking expansion of LM Glasfiber in the Industrial Park. He showed the drawing of the primary building of the LM Glasfiber facility and another building to the north that comprised 70% for LM Glasfiber with the remainder housing Amazon.com. The LM Glasfiber business has continued to grow and they have requested through the appeal process to increase the impervious surface area from 85% to 87% on the lot shared with Amazon.com. Gengler indicated on the drawing where the parking areas would be added. The plan has been reviewed by the engineering staff relative to the extension of the underground storm pipes and drainage system. He commented that additional paving is also taking place on the main facility, however, it does not exceed the maximum allowable impervious surface. Allowing the increase will not cause any undue hardship and staff’s recommendation is for approval.

There was a short discussion on the stormsewer drainage for the area.

Lee opened the public hearing. There was no one to speak on the issue and the public hearing was closed.

MOTION BY WHITCOMB AND SECOND BY CHRISTENSEN TO APPROVE THE APPEAL REQUEST. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

3-7. MATTER OF THE REQUEST FROM EAPC ARCHITECTS, ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA, FOR APPROVAL OF AN ENTRANCE SIGN IN THE U-D UNIVERSITY ZONING DISTRICT TO BE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF 2ND AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH COLUMBIA ROAD.

Gengler reviewed the request for one entrance sign at the University of North Dakota. The university has approval for four entrance signs. The proposed sign is proposed in conjunction with the new parking ramp now under construction. The sign will be a v-shaped sign with 38.4 square feet for each panel. The sign will advertise various activities on campus as well as the occupancy level of the parking ramp. The sign will have an electronic display board and is consistent with what was approved in the past according to code. The maximum readerboard size is 18.8 feet by 7.5 feet. The city traffic engineer reviewed the location of the sign and did not feel there would be any problems. As established in the code, the sign must be approved by the planning and zoning commission.

Grasser asked if the readerboard was scrolled lettering. His concern was for the flashing type of readerboard since it will be located next to an intersection. Gengler stated the code does not specify flash times.

Jay Kleven, EAPC Architects Engineers, referred to a letter included in each members’ packet regarding how the university plans to utilize the sign. The readerboard will only be a text message that scrolls information about the university and events taking place at the university as well as ramp status. It will not be a strobing, multi-colored electronic sign; it will only be a text device with red lettering on a black background. He noted it is the same as the one located at the Chester Fritz Auditorium.
MOTION BY CHRISTENSEN AND SECOND BY HAGNESS TO APPROVE THE SIGN WITH AN ELECTRONIC READERBOARD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA.

The sign dimensions were discussed.

Mr. Kleven was asked when the ramp would be completed. He replied the university would like the ramp to be operational by mid-September.

Malm referred to the note on Exhibit A that indicates a future right turn lane on the intersection where the sign will be located. He asked how much room was between the base of the sign and the right-turn lane. Mr. Kleven stated there would not be a buffer between the future right turn that is identified. The right-turn is part of a corridor study but is not included on any capital plan. The university is aware of the possible right turn lane and will accommodate whatever needs to be done for corridor improvement.

Grasser said that was a struggle for him as well as the original ramp as far as traffic problems. It is not defined in a detailed plan as yet and the property is still owned by the university.

Malm asked where the entry for the parking ramp was located. Mr. Kleven said it was on 2nd Avenue North (private UND road) about 170 feet west of the property line parallel to Columbia Road (almost in the middle of the facility).

Hagness asked if the sign jeopardizes the right turn lane when it is proposed or would the sign have to be removed? Mr. Kleven said that would depend on how far Columbia Road is widened. If there was a single curb cut for a right turn lane using the existing lane structure, the sign could stay in place. The corridor improvement study would recommend one whole extra lane and a right turn lane. If that happens, the sign would have to be relocated. However, the likelihood of that happening in the foreseeable future is rather slim.

MOTION TO AMEND THE MOTION BY HAGNESS AND SECOND BY CHRISTENSEN THAT IF THE ROADWAY IS WIDENED FOR A RIGHT TURN LANE, RELOCATION OF THE SIGN WOULD BE AT THE UNIVERSITY’S EXPENSE; NOT THE CITY’S.

Staff agreed with the amendment.

Mr. Kleven stated the right turn lane is not a defined criteria at this point that has to be met now. The amendment asks that the university accept a condition now to accommodate some undefined future potential consideration. He said he could not answer for the university accepting that. They have acknowledged that the risk is there.

Christensen said there had been issues with an underpass or overpass on 42nd Street on how much land we need and how much it will cost. The city has learned. We will accommodate the university on the sign and the placement, but someday there might be a road there and the city does not want to pay for the sign. If the sign has to be removed in the future because of a right turn lane, then it will be at the university’s expense and not at the expense of the citizens of Grand Forks.

Grasser said the potential for the right turn lane has been defined well enough that there are dashed lines on the map and is part of the original site plan. There is nothing in the capital budget but it is depicted well enough that dimensions are shown. However, the land is owned by the university and when and if the expansions are necessary, the city will need to deal with the State of North Dakota on property acquisitions. Grasser said he did not have a problem with the motion and amendment. It will be a shame if they find out the parking ramp starts to generate traffic and turning movements to require the turn lane and thereby cause a conflict with the sign.

MOTION FOR THE AMENDMENT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

Malm said he would vote against the motion because he feels the parking ramp will create a bottleneck when entering and exiting the parking ramp.

ORIGINAL MOTION, AS AMENDED, PASSED WITH MALM VOTING NAY.

4. COMMUNICATIONS AND PRELIMINARY APPROVALS:

NONE.

5. REPORTS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

5-1. MATTER OF REPORT ON CEMETERY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.

Gengler offered information for a proposed cemetery. In the A-1 and A-2 zoning districts, it was decided to list them as needing a conditional use permit (CUP). Recently, the Calvary Cemetery Association approached the planning department to locate a 20-acre cemetery approximately three miles south of 62nd Avenue in the Walle Township. Staff is recommending that instead of going through the CUP process, the preference is to use the planned unit development process. If it were processed as a CUP, there are conditions placed and if they are not met, the CUP is pulled. How do you pull a CUP for a cemetery after it has been in use for several years and what type of conditions would be placed on a cemetery? In reviewing and changing the land development code during the past year, the regulations adopted focused on residential development (excluding dimensional standards for non-residential land uses).

Christensen wondered why with all the land available, why would the cemetery be on Columbia Road? Staff noted the current cemeteries are located on main corridors (Columbia Road and Gateway Drive; Washington Street and 32nd Avenue South).

Whitcomb left the meeting at 8:03 p.m.

Gengler explained the cemetery association had been in talks with local landowners who have been receptive to a cemetery located by them.

Hagness asked staff if the costs of the planned unit development would be more than using the CUP process. He wondered if the process would be more cost prohibitive for the association. Gengler replied the property would have to be platted, drainage studies would have to be done and soil testing would be required. Those costs are required anyway. There will be standards to apply whether the property is in a PUD or processed as a CUP.

Matejcek said he found it ironic that a landfill is a permitted use and could be placed in the county and not have any discussion about it, but a CUP would be required for a cemetery. Under the old standards of the A-1 and A-2, churches and cemeteries were a permitted use and there was no permitted use for a landfill. Now it is reversed.

Christensen said there was state statute that allows cemeteries as a permitted use. He suggested staff discuss the issue with the city attorney and review the state law. If a CUP is used, then that will always be the use.

Gengler stated there had been discussions with the city attorney. In discussions with the land development code subcommittee, certain dimensional standards for the A-1 and A-2 were established such as 1 per 40 acres, setbacks, defined minimum lot size, etc. However, none of that discussion related to cemeteries. The PUD process was a way of developing a cemetery without having to address minimum lot size, etc. The PUD is the zoning and the code would not have to be changed to accommodate them.

Matejcek asked if the 20 acres was a part of a much larger parcel for the cemetery. Gengler answered he was under the impression there was a signed purchase agreement and the 20 acres was a part of a much larger parcel. The 20 acres is part of a 100 to 200 acres.

John Herz, 1019 22nd Avenue South, board member of the Calvary Cemetery Association, stated the cemetery at the corner of Gateway Drive and Columbia Road has 13 acres and the cemetery has been in existence for 100 years. The land purchase agreement will last for 100-150 years. The reason for buying land for a new cemetery is because they are running out of room at the existing cemetery.

After further discussion, commission members agreed that the cemetery should be processed through the PUD.

5-2. MATTER OF REPORT FROM EARL HAUGEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE GRAND FORKS-EAST GRAND FORKS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (GF-EGF MPO), REGARDING THE LATEST INFORMATION ON THE LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN.

Christensen left the meeting at 8:15 p.m.

Earl Haugen, Director of the Grand Forks-East Grand Forks Metropolitan Planning Organization, gave a power point presentation on the latest information on the long-range transportation plan. He stated the street and highway plan took five years to accomplish. He spoke on the alternatives analysis of 2004 and showed a list of the confirmed areas as well as the areas to be re-evaluated. The next activities are to continue alternative analysis to further narrow down to recommended alternatives, provide updated financial forecasts of funding available and provide updated cost estimates.

Hagness asked if the I-29/17th Avenue overpass had been approved by the city and Haugen answered yes.

On December 11, the fiscal constraint issues have to be met. The MPO will have to project what the future costs and revenues will be. Forecasting revenues will be very difficult. The current transportation bill will expire in 2009 and discussions are on-going on how transportation across the nation will continue.

Haugen stated they have looked at the historic spending in the metropolitan area and adjusted the costs from the 1990s through the 2007 costs. Inflation will eat up any revenue increases, so we predict flat or decreasing revenue and the best North Dakota can expect is a 1 – 2 % growth. It was agreed to use the 2% annual growth. He also discussed the forecasting for the year a project will be constructed versus the costs and revenues if it is constructed within zero to five years, six to fifteen years and sixteen plus years.

Haugen talked about the planning level cost estimates and used the DeMers Avenue and Washington Street intersection as an example of large “swing” in costs. NDDOT historically would not “fund an improvement that did not raise the level of service to a grade “C” or better and the only planning level solution to a level of service “C” is the split diamond urban interchange which a cost estimate of $20 million. He talked about the various alternatives considered. Haugen also showed a map of the various congested locations in the city of Grand Forks and the congested expansion results. He offered various scenarios of the congested locations and the grade level results with improvements.

Presentation ensued (a copy of which is available upon request).



6. OTHER BUSINESS:

Lee noted that the commission seat held by Dr. Rob Kweit had not been filled and Gary Malm is still serving although his appointment was up in February. He will continue to serve until he is either re-appointed or replaced. Lee asked staff to check on the two appointments. Gengler stated he had corresponded with the mayor’s office on the appointments but had not received an answer. He will send further correspondence.

Lee announced there were only three members left on the sign subcommittee and at one time, there were five members. She asked Dr. Hall prior to the meeting to be a temporary member on the subcommittee and he agreed to do so. She asked if there was a volunteer to be a temporary member so there would be five members on the committee. Adams volunteered to serve on the committee.


Hagness stated that Cliff Coss had an item for rezoning that was to be on the agenda for tonight’s meeting and it was not listed. Brooks said it was processed too late to be on the agenda and would be on the October meeting agenda.

7. ADJOURNMENT.

MOTION BY MALM AND SECOND BY MATEJCEK TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:52P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.



____________________________
Lyle A. Hall, Secretary


____________________________
Paula H. Lee, Vice-President