Print VersionStay Informed
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA
November 18, 2002

The city council of the city of Grand Forks, North Dakota met in the council chambers in City Hall on Monday, November 18, 2002 at the hour of 7:00 o’clock p.m. with Mayor Brown presiding. Present at roll call were Council Members Brooks, Gershman, Christensen, Kerian, Kreun - 5; absent: Council Members Hamerlik, Glassheim - 2. Mayor Brown stated that Dean Hamerlik is excused as he is at the Engelstad welcoming Dale Brown to the city.

Mayor Brown announced that anyone wishing to speak to any item may do so by being recognized prior to a vote being taken on the matter, and that the meeting is being televised and taped for later broadcast.

Mayor Brown also announced that this week is Youth Appreciation Week and that Dale Brown is giving his special presentation on "Winning the Game of Life" at the Engelstad Arena tonight, and that Dean Hamerlik, Vice President of the council is welcoming Dale Brown to the community.

He congratulated the organizers of the Dakota Pride Show this weekend at the Alerus, and that over 5,400 people attended the show. He also congratulated the Alerus staff for the events this weekend: state football championship, UND football game and the Dakota Pride Show with over 10,000 people.

APPROVE APPLICATION FOR MOVING PERMIT TO
MOVE BUILDING FROM 117 PARK AVENUE TO 1824
NORTH 4TH STREET FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING

The city auditor reported that the notice of public hearing on the application by Corey Uhrich to move a building from 117 Park Avenue to 1824 North 4th Street to be used as a single-family home had been published and posted as required.

Mayor Brown called upon the audience to see if there was anyone present who had comments to make on this matter; there were none, and the hearing was closed.

The staff report relating to the moving permit application to move single family home from 117 Park Avenue to 1824 North 4th Street, with recommendation to approve the moving permit.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Gershman that this recommendation be approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

INTRODUCE ORDINANCES RELATING TO FEES FOR
XCEL ENERGY ELECTRICITY FRANCHISE AND
NATURAL GAS FRANCHISE

The staff report from the city attorney relating to the franchise fee ordinance Xcel Energy (electricity) and franchise fee ordinance Xcel Energy (natural gas); with recommendation to introduce franchise fee ordinances and approve for first reading.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that this recommendation be approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.
Council Member Brooks introduced an ordinance entitled "An ordinance amending Section 7(B) of Ordinance No. 2906 of the Grand Forks City Code relating to franchise fees for Xcel Energy (formerly known as Northern States Power Company) electricity franchise", which was presented, read and passed on its first reading.

Council Member Brooks introduced an ordinance entitled "An ordinance amending Section 7(B) and (D) of Ordinance No. 2907 of the Grand Forks City Code relating to franchise fees for Xcel Energy (formerly known as Northern States Power Company) natural gas franchise", which was presented, read and passed on its first reading.

APPROVE ISSUANCE OF CLASS 3 (OFF AND/OR ON
SALE BEER AND WINE) LICENSE FOR THE Q, 1210
SOUTH WASHINGTON STREET

The staff report from the finance department relating to the application for Class 3 (Off and/or On Sale Beer and Wine) license by David J. Davidshofer and David J. Freidig dba The Q, 1210 South Washington Street, with recommendation to approve issuance of the license contingent upon meeting all regulations of the City Code, including approval of the city attorney and sign off by appropriate departments (police, fire, health and inspections).

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council member Kreun that this recommendation be approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

APPROVE EXPENDITURE FOR PROJECT NO. 5116,
ENGLISH COULEE DIVERSION PROJECT

The staff report from the engineering department relating to additional excess earth material from Project No. 5116, English Coulee Diversion Project, with recommendation to approve $500,000 expenditure for English Coulee Diversion contractor to transport additional excess earth material from project to the municipal landfill.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that this recommendation be approved. Upon roll call the following voted "aye": Council Members Brooks, Gershman, Christensen, Kerian, Kreun - 5; voting "nay": none. Mayor Brown declared the motion carried.

APPROVE FINAL PLAT OF REPLAT OF LOT B,
BLOCK 1 OF A REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ULLAND
PARK FIRST ADDITION

The staff report from the planning department relating to request from CPS, Ltd on behalf of the Grand Forks Park District for final approval (fast track) of a Replat of Lot B, Block 1 of a Replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Ulland Park First Addition, city of Grand Forks, North Dakota (located south of 47th Avenue South and east of Columbia Road), with recommendation for final approval of the Replat of Lot B, Block 1 of a Replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Ulland Park First Addition.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that this recommendation be approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.
APPROVE FINAL PLAT OF REPLAT OF LOTS E AND
F OF THE REPLAT OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 6, BLOCK 1,
COLUMBIA PARK 27TH ADDITION

The staff report relating to the request from CPS, Ltd. on behalf of KTJ, Ltd for final approval (fast track) of a Replat of Lots E and F of the Replat of Lots 1 through 6, Block 1, Columbia Park 27th Addition to the city of Grand Forks, North Dakota (located at Grand Forks Marketplace in the southwest corner of 32nd Avenue South and South 38th Street), with recommendation for final approval of the replat subject to the conditions shown on or attached to the review copy.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that this recommendation be approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND ZONING MAP
TO INCLUDE WITHIN HOMESTEAD GROVE PUD
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), CONCEPT DEVELOP-
MENT PLAN, ALL OF W HALF OF SW QUARTER OF
SECTION 22, T151N, R50W OF 5TH P.M.

The staff report from the Planning and Zoning Commission relating to the request from CPS, Ltd. on behalf of Homestead Grove Partnership for preliminary approval of an ordinance to amend the zoning map to exclude from the A-1 (Limited Development) District and to include within the Homestead Grove PUD (Planned Unit Development), Concept Development Plan, all of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 151 North, Range 50 West of the 5th Principal Meridian (located east of South Washington Street between 40th Avenue South and 47th Avenue South), with recommendation to give preliminary approval of the ordinance and Planned Unit Development, Concept Development Plan, subject to the conditions shown on or attached to the review copy and to set a public hearing for December 16, 2002.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that this recommendation be approved.

Council Member Christensen asked to be recused from voting on this matter, and it was so moved by Council Members Gershman and Brooks. Carried 4 votes affirmative.

Upon call for the question and upon voice vote, the motion carried 4 votes affirmative.

Council Member Kreun introduced an ordinance entitled "An ordinance to amend the zoning map of the city of Grand Forks, North Dakota, to rezone and exclude from the A-1 (Limited Development) District and to include within the Homestead Grove PUD (Planned Unit Development) Concept Development Plan, all of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 151 North, Range 50 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Grand Forks, North Dakota", which was presented, read and passed on its first reading.

APPROVE PRELIMINARY PLAT, AND INTRODUCE
ORDINANCE AMENDING STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN
TO INCLUDE PUBLIC R/W SHOWN AS DEDICATED ON
THE PLAT OF HOMESTEAD GROVE FIRST ADDITION
The staff report from the Planning and Zoning Commission relating to the request from CPS, Ltd on behalf of LPF Properties for preliminary approval of the plat of Homestead Grove First Addition to the city of Grand Forks, North Dakota (located north of 47th Avenue South between Sunbeam 5th Resubdivision and South 11th Street, with recommendation to give preliminary approval of the plat, subject to conditions shown on or attached to the review copy including an ordinance amending the Street and Highway Plan, and to set a public hearing for December 16, 2002.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that this recommendation be approved.

Council Member Christensen asked to be recused from voting on this matter, and it was so moved by Council Members Gershman and Brooks. Carried 4 votes affirmative.

Upon call for the question and upon voice vote, the motion carried 4 votes affirmative.

Council Member Kreun introduced an ordinance entitled "An ordinance to amend the Street and Highway Plan of the city of Grand Forks, North Dakota, to include the public rights of way shown as dedicated on the plat of Homestead Grove First Addition, Grand Forks, North Dakota", which was presented, read and passed on its first reading.

APPROVE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF REPLAT OF LOT
1, BLOCK 1, PERKINS FIFTH ADDITION

The staff report from the Planning and Zoning Commission relating to the request from Pribula Engineering and Surveying on behalf of David Parker for preliminary approval of a Replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Perkins Fifth Addition to the city of Grand Forks, North Dakota (located west of South Columbia Road and south of 36th Avenue South), with recommendation to give preliminary approval of the replat, subject to the conditions shown on or attached to the review copy.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that this recommendation be approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO CITY PLUMBING BOARD

The staff report from Mayor Brown relating to the reappointments to the Grand Forks City Plumbing Board, with recommendation for council to confirm reappointment of Ron Effhauser, Kevin Bosch and Steve Monroe as members of the City Plumbing Board.

It was moved by Council Member Kerian and seconded by Council Member Kreun that these appointments be confirmed and approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

INTRODUCE ORDINANCE RELATING TO TECHNICAL
CODE CORRECTIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

The staff report from the city attorney relating to adoption of the technical corrections ordinance, with recommendation to give preliminary approval and introduce technical corrections ordinance for first reading.

Mr. Swanson, city attorney, stated he did not have a chance to make changes in the ordinance as discussed by the committee of the whole but would bring those forward at the next meeting.

It was moved by Council Member Kreun and seconded by Council Member Brooks to accept the ordinance as presented, and to introduce the ordinance for first reading.

Council Member Gershman asked to be recused from voting on this matter, and it was so moved by Council Member Christensen and seconded by Council Member Kerian. Carried 4 votes affirmative.

Council Member Brooks expressed some concern relating to the annual report in Section 24-0110 ; and moved to retain what was stricken in Section 24-0110 (Records and reports of the authority and growth fund committee) and be reinstated with the exception of the word "detailed"; Council Member Kreun seconded the amendment. Carried 4 votes affirmative; Council Member Gershman recused from voting.

Upon call for the question on the motion, as amended, and upon voice vote, the motion carried 4 votes affirmative, Council Member Gershman recused from voting.

Council Member Kreun introduced an ordinance entitled "An ordinance amending sections of the Grand Forks City Code relating to technical code corrections and miscellaneous provisions", which was presented, read and passed on its first reading.

RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT RE. STORM WATER
LIFT STATION NO. 89 AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
STUDY TO SURROUNDING AREA, AND DIRECT
ENGINEERING STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS

The staff report from the engineering department relating to Storm Water Lift Station No. 89 and drainage improvement study to surrounding area, with recommendation to receive and file report, direct engineering staff to hold a public information meeting.

Council Member Kreun stated they do want to receive and file the report but also want to direct the engineering staff to hold the public information meetings and also to start implementing the design stage of this particular lift station, it's a 4-5 month design period that it takes and want to be able to give the citizens the information so they can help make some of the decisions. He stated there was a suggestion that we should look at how these kinds of projects can be funded and that the engineering department has a huge master plan so that all of these things can be looked at one time and perhaps a financing package could be put together for an on-going process - that he would like to keep those two separate but also direct or ask for information from the council on which group (ad hoc or CIP) to bring this to analyze financing mechanism that we would have.

Council Member Gershman recommended that the mayor consider sending it to the CIP so that all of the council members can participate in the discussion, that they received a listing today from Mr. Grasser of additional types of projects around the city, and that this may be the time to have the discussion of unwinding some special assessments and taking a look as to how they are going to go forward with this, and would agree to separate them.

Council Member Christensen stated that this is not one lift station but three, it's $13,524,000 without engineering, etc., that Council Member Hamerlik pointed out that there was a $10-12 million study that was done several years ago that has never been implemented, that there is a section of town called Legend Lane that has the same problem; this project may happen but not sure it will happen before we get our fee structure study that is on-going and will be getting a report from our utility fee study sometime in January. He stated that he was good to go with putting this in with the CIP but there are a number of CIP projects that have been presented by our council, the past council and a lot fall by the wayside because of not wanting to levy the special assessments or finding another way of paying for them. He stated the study they are envisioning is a study that isn't going to go forward until such time as they have a better feel for how they are going to develop our fees for water, sewer, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and getting a better handle on how much our current charges are being set aside to fund future improvements; that 3 or 4 months from now are not going to have anything in place to begin the funding of this until such time as get that fee study and are going to be forced to levy special assessments - and that talking about doing this so that the citizens can have input, and the only input the citizens need is what is it going to cost with the current special assessment structure in place as we know it and how much is that going to be added to my special assessment bill on top of the dike assessments.

Council Member Brooks stated that we need the public hearings and the problem has been around for a long time, and e-mailed council members about an area in his ward that's been a problem since 1970, have to start something and with idea of some long term changes but need to look to the future and make some long term decision that are good for the citizens and future and need to look at city-wide.

Council Member Kreun stated they need to clarify that these are two separate issues and if go forward with the project and design and information gathering process it may very well be special assessed, and the other portion of this questions is a separate issue and may take longer than 4-6 months to really come up with the process that we're looking for, and have to look at the whole process as far as the design and study indicated and want to utilize that and want to utilize some of the things they've already done and want to incorporate a solution to this one problem as well into the process of fixing the storm water and financing it; two separate issues here but attack both at the same time.

Council Member Gershman stated the policy decision of going forward with these types of special assessments and need to talk about it and get the utility study is important but can have the discussion on the special assessments concurrently during the time that is being processed, and to bring the CIP back is more to focus on this issue and not to go through the whole CIP process, but having the council together to focus on this issue and will be a very complicated thing to see if we decide to unravel, not having the regular CIP process with a number of issues on the agenda.

Council Member Christensen stated he is trying to let the public know that this a project that is before council, that in the past there was a project that was proposed in Council Member Hamerlik's area and never moved forward (part of it was done), that Mr. Grasser sent them a memo as to his understanding of projects that had been proposed but not funded and that going out and asking for bids and getting designs and costs is fine but until such time as you come up with the different method of paying for these projects will have to special assess it, but it is his understanding that these types of improvements cannot be protested out and if the council were to decide to go forward and create the district, the citizens couldn't protest it out and this would be done and the specials laid on top of all the other specials they have, and that's why concerned about a project such as this because we know that it's $13-14 million and if this were to go forward, they couldn't protest, and somewhere along the line we could face the same process we followed behind McDonald's but what we could do before we went too far with this is just have a rough estimate of what the specials would be and give notice to all the citizens that we plan on doing this and estimate of what your bill would be, and have a public hearing or two so they would have the opportunity to come forward with input before we go much further. He stated there are other projects that haven't been done and as we go forward as we're thinking about changing how we're going to pay for these projects in lieu of a citywide special assessment, as he may not be in favor of that, and when get idea of total cost in next 5-10 years and could build that into our rate structure study that we're doing now, and rather than moving it forward would rather see us get estimates to our consultants who are doing the rate study and have a better tool for planning and thinks that's the way end up paying for these projects if don't have special assessments.

Council Member Brooks stated that one of the questions will be, why did this happen, and need to answer the public and how prevent it from happening again, and stated that he has received phone calls this week, and would get vast majority of saying they have had enough of special assessments, with dike coming down, but no more, and not sure that special assessments are the way to do it.

It was moved by Council Member Kreun and seconded by Council Member Gershman to receive and file the report and direct engineering staff to hold public information meetings after having received information to give them a rough estimate of what it would cost. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

REFER MATTER OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON
FINANCING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR CITY GROWTH-
CONNECTION FEES TO STANDBY COMMITTEE

The staff report from the engineering department relating to policies and procedures on financing infrastructure for city growth-connection fees, with recommendation to adopt the revised connection fee policy, and depreciation schedules.

Council Member Kreun stated there were some technical questions asked and staff hasn't had the time to answer those, that he would like to bring this to the ad hoc committee meeting of service/safety. The motion was seconded by Council Member Kerian. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

APPROVE REQUEST FROM PEAVEY COMPANY FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DRY FERTILIZER
STORAGE FACILITY AT 4256 54TH AVENUE NORTH

The staff report from the Planning and Zoning Commission relating to the request from Peavey Company on behalf of U.A.P. Ostlund for approval of a conditional use permit for a dry-fertilizer storage facility (located in the SE Quarter of Section 18, Township 152 North, Range 50 West (located at 4256 54th Avenue North, Grand Forks, North Dakota), with recommendation for approval of the request from Peavy Company on behalf of U.A.P. Ostlund for approval of a conditional use permit for a dry-fertilizer storage facility, subject to the conditional use permit provisions.

Council Member Kreun stated there were some questions with the local citizens and the Peavey Company relating to how the road would be built and how to maintain that particular section of alternate road and that Mr. Potter has worked with Peavey Company and some of the residents and has submitted a memo with some of the suggests from the Peavey Company.

Mr. Potter stated his memorandum covers three items that clarify some of the issues that were discussed at the committee of the whole meeting: the first item is a revised Condition No. 3 and is the language of the city attorney's office that defines the term conditional use permit and also the fact that the permit may be renewed by the city council upon such terms, conditions and requirements as the council deems reasonably necessary or appropriate. A new condition No. 11, which states that the applicant will not block 54th Avenue North and the alternate access road connection to U.S. 81 at the same time. He stated that while this condition applies to the applicant it at no way applies to Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, which also has its main northbound track in the same area and if they are running through trains they have the possibility of blocking both of these and that they do not have anything before us relating to BNSF RR. A new condition No. 12 that the applicant will implement items 1-5 contained in ConAgra's letter of November 14, 2002 to the Grand Forks Planning Department (and letter attached to the memorandum) and if the council approves this those 5 points would be included as additional conditions.

Clarence Volk, 6033 North 42nd Street, township supervisor of Falconer Township, reported he has to compliment ConAgra and Peavey for coming up with the agreement to address their concerns, and now the concern is Burlington Northern which hasn't been addressed and their concern is the emergency response vehicles in that area and anybody having to wait for care for any period of time is too long, and if they could get BN involved in this it would take care of the concerns and do need to address that.

Council Member Christensen stated that once a unit train was dropped off at this facility, that even though the cars may be the Railroad's that the moving of that train then becomes the responsibility of ConAgra and Peavey and that based on this permit once they have control of the cars, they would be required to make sure that the roads weren't blocks and being responsible for honoring the terms of the permit. He stated that might be something the city attorney would have to address. Mr. Swanson stated the difficulty of what they are raising, is that the City has very limited authority over the Railroad and what limited authority they have can only be exercised within the corporate limits, and this is outside the corporate limits.

It was moved by Council Member Kreun to approve the recommendation with the additional items from ConAgra. Council Member Kerian seconded the motion. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO THE GRAND FORKS
CITY ELECTRICAL BOARD

The recommendation by Mayor Brown relating to new appointments to Grand Forks City Electrical Board with request for confirmation of the new appointments of Mark Lothspeich, Greg Mattson, Brian Poykko and Deb Thompson as the members of the Board.

Bev Collings, Zoning Administrator, reported there are four new members to the Board, previous members serve the Board very well and that they did serve for an average of up to 10 years, that one left town and one retired so had some openings and had excellent response to new members on the Board.

It was moved by Council Member Brooks and seconded by Council Member Kerian to confirm the Mayor's appointments to the City Electrical Board. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

APPROVE BILL LISTING

Vendor Payment Listing No. 02-22, dated November 20, 2002, and totaling $1,456,023.06, were presented and read.

It was moved by Council Member Gershman and seconded by Council Member Brooks that these bills be allowed and that the city auditor be authorized to issue warrants in payment of the same. Upon roll call the following voted "aye": Council Members Brooks, Gershman, Christensen, Kerian, Kreun - 5; voting "nay": none. Mayor Brown declared the motion carried and the bills ordered paid.

APPROVE MINUTES, NOVEMBER 4, 2002

Typewritten copies of the minutes of the city council meeting held on Monday, November 4, 2002 were presented and read. It was moved by Council Member Brooks and seconded by Council Member Kerian that the minutes be approved. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS

1) Council Member Kreun expressed concern as to how information is brought to the public and how it is given, esp. the information that was given in Saturday's paper relating to budget cuts or increases, that the budget for the police department in 2001 which comes out of the general fund was almost $4.9 million, in 2002 the same fund was $5.1 million and proposed budget in that same area was $5.3 million, almost half million increase in two-year period and doesn't know how that terms a budget cut - that the information given out is questionable and thinks that should be corrected and whoever gave the information should come forward and correct it; that they worked very hard not to increase taxes for taxpayers and do increase some of the budgets to meet the demands of the city, and characterized as a budget cut when actually an increase. He noted there have been other items in the media, i.e., technical corrections ordinance wasn't explained properly and that should be corrected as well; and stated to be careful as not always what they seem.

2) Council Member Christensen stated he would echo those comments, that those who serve the media could readily get the annual budget of the city and would see the revenues of the police department for 2001, 2002 and 2003; and that when they worked on this budget that before the flood there were 71 uniformed officers and after the flood 80+, that there was an increase in officers because of the
"Clinton Cops" (grant cops), that they received the funds for the officers and had to make a commitment of one year after the funds expired to retain the officers, and were then allowed to eliminate the officers if didn't have the funds - that what they are trying to do is give the department heads money and then manage with the funds they have and department heads make the decision as to how they are going to spend the money and deliver the services, and that's department heads decision, not a council decision, and that the council never discussed cutting McGruff or to cut two civilian employees, those were decision that were made internally.

3) Council Member Christensen stated there was discussion this evening relating to elimination of special assessments, noted his telephone number and that he is on the web and would entertain any comments or conversations from anybody as to how they think we could change the delivery of the capital infrastructure in this community without special assessments, that he thinks it's an archaic system but doesn't mean that it doesn't have a use, or purpose and was put in place many years ago and will debate it and will be a process 3-10 years but we are going to need funds for the improvements and if we don't special only get the funds from fees or from what we charge for the services that we pay for and they are enterprise funds and that consultants are giving us a complete overview of how we charge in this city for everything in our enterprise funds and will be as historic as our wage study change that is going on which was adopted last year and going to perhaps result in some increased fees for storm sewer, and maybe easier for increase for storm sewer of $1.00 or more rather than this project they have discussed tonight for the people that would be affected with $4200 for all three lift stations over 10 or 20 year period. He stated that the work that went into the budget that was balanced and didn't raise taxes and maintain level of services, and commended the mayor for allowing the council to sit on the ad hoc committees and put together these plans.

4) Council Member Brooks stated when he has a problem with articles in the paper, he e-mails the editorial board and also if he likes it; that staff worked very hard on the budget. He thanked staff for listing of all committees and members; and that this week they had a meeting with staff and UND staff and students and discussed lines of communication, some ideas and good things came from them. He asked if the hotel negotiation team was meeting, Mayor Brown stated it is meeting and getting closer to negotiating deal.

5) Council Member Gershman stated that the cooperative atmosphere we have with the administration, department heads and the mayor, really has been a lot of fun; that they said several years ago it would like to see this job be fun and have an elevated dialogue and think they are changing that and if you watch the process and see the cooperation that they have and others will be inspired to run for office and not taking so much time and have fewer controversial items and appreciates that, have dealt with a number of them and appreciates discussion between council members is on a nice level.

Council Member Gershman stated that this weekend was quite a weekend in Grand Forks, that at least 50,000 people that attended an event - be it an arts event, ND Museum of Art had some activities, state football championship, Dakota Pride, UND football, UND hockey, boxing.

ADJOURN

It was moved by Council Member Kreun and seconded by Council Member Christensen that we adjourn. Carried 5 votes affirmative.

Respectfully submitted,



John M. Schmisek
City Auditor

Approved:
____________________________
Michael R. Brown, Mayor